BLACKROCK, SPIKE PROTEINS, GOF, and BIS
In the last 4 years, words and acronyms that I never heard before have now become part of my diurnal vocabulary, as familiar to me as phrases such as 'monopoly capitalisml', transnational corporations, genetically modified organisms, and genocide.
BLACK ROCK, VANGUARD AND STATE STREET
are the three biggest 'asset managers' in the world. BlackRock controls 10 trillion dollars of assets, many times more than the revenue of the richest corporations in the world, with Vanguard and State Street close behind. These three in turn invest in each other in an esoteric dance of double- dealing so complex that even those dancing it don't really understand how it works. What they know is that their assets keep on growing when they double deal enough, dance deviously enough, cheat and lie enough.
They have a big fat finger in every economic pie on the planet. Every human being alive today is intimately affected by their Machiavellian machinations in the financial markets.
Do their share holders and investors benefit from the war industries - the wanton killing, maiming and displacement of millions of innocent people every year?
Yes.
Do their share holders and investors benefit from the processed food industry that pushes empty, dangerous and addictive calories down the throats of almost all of the working classes in the West, and is trying to do the same in the South and East?
Yes.
Do their share holders and investors benefit from the corrupt and virtually un-regulated medical industries that are the third largest killer in the world?
Yes.
Do their share holders and investors benefit from the agri-businesses that are not only killing us off with crops that are packed with pollutants, but also destroying the small scale farmers who supply most of the world's food as well as destroying the living soil upon which we are all dependent?
Yes.
Do they benefit from the myriad of other industrial activities that destroy our natural matrix, our Mother Nature, our Mater Dolorosa?
Yes.
Did they benefit from the recent 'Massacre of the Innocents' perpetrated by the medical industries, and the central governments of the richest nations in the world, 'locking down' the innocent as if they were prisoners, injecting them with experimental poisons as if they were a Dr Mengele's unwilling subjects, making them wear useless body coverings as a 'public sign' that they had submitted to their lies?
Yes.
'SPIKE PROTEINS'
All the awake among us now know this word like the back of our hand. This refers to one of the little crowns on the SARS-Cov-2 virus that almost certainly was created in a lab, probably a Chinese one funded by US taxpayers. This little limb on the surface of the virus enables it to 'infect' a human cell much more easily than your average corona virus 'spike'. 'Technically' speaking, this particular spike has way of 'breaking' that enables the whole virus to enter our cells with the ease of a knife slicing through butter: this breaking point is termed a 'Furin Cleavage Site'.
Why would anyone want to create a virus with this type of spike that made the virus much more infectious to humans than normal corona viruses?
Their answer is: 'In order to create a vaccine or medicine that would control the virus in the hardly imaginable event that Nature would evolve such a virus in wild animals that rarely have any contact with humans.'
I don't think so!
But did the inventors of this spike know that this spike would be:
a) Highly toxic on its own?
b) Able to travel to and harm any part of the body?
Who knows.
Oddly, the inventors of the new 'vaccines' decided that the 'vaccine' should tell our bodies to reproduce billions and billions of these deadly spikes. In turn our defence cells would learn to recognise this spike, neutralise it, and then if the whole virus got into us, would recognise the whole virus from this little spike and eliminate the whole virus.
Four problems immediately:
1. Would our body's defences be able to neutralise all the billuons of toxic spikes created by the vaccine? Or could some escape, and travel to and damage irreparably hearts, brains, liver, kidneys, eyes, etc.? The answer now is known to be "Yes, they will travel."
2. Would the vaccine's messenger's telling our bodies to produce these billions of 'spikes' self-destruct in good time so that our bodies would stop making these lethal particles of protein? The answer now is known to be "No."
3. Could a vaccinated person choc-a-bloc full of these spikes and the vaccine's genetic messengers telling the vaccinated person's body to produce millions or billions of these spikes 'shed these toxic particles onto other people? The answer is now known to be "Yes."
4. As this little spike is only one of a number of characteristics of the whole virus, the whole virus can mutate fairly quickly a different type of spike to replace it, and then bypass the highly focused immune memory of our bodies which is only looking for this type of spike, not the whole virus. The 'vaccine' becomes useless within months. And then you need a new vaccine. Patented and sold at great profit to governments everywhere, who pay for it with our money, and who themselves have investments in the companies that make the vaccines. Cui bono, mes camarades, cui bono, from this Dance of Death led by the Big Boys?
Even more, would the absence of long term legal testing of these 'vaccines' result in them causing many serious side effects, including many deaths?
The answer is now known to be "Yes."
This 'vaccine' has caused more damage and death than all other vaccines added together over a long period.
'Scientific papers' claimed that these 'vaccines' would stay in the muscle tissue of the injection site, and not travel around the body because they had built in them certain design features that would guarantee that. Long term testing in the real world therefore was not necessary. Were these claims proven wrong even in a very short term period?
"Yes."
'Scientific papers' claimed that the genetic material in these 'vaccines' would neither last long in the body, nor would the mRNA convert to permanent DNA. This claim was based on special design features that would prevent this, they claimed. Therefore long term testing in the real world was not necessary. Were these claims proven wrong?
"Yes."
"GOF"
is the acronym for Gain of Function Research. This research modifies viruses and bacteria that are harmless to humans, making them extremely harmful to humans. The much-publicised pretext for this 'research' is the following 'story' you can find in ‘peer-reviewed’ ‘scientific’ papers, tarted up of course with lot of numbers and a lot of esoteric jargon:
'One day a harmless wild virus or bacterium in animals might mutate into one that is extremely dangerous to humans. 'Scientists' therefore must choose, more or less at random, one of the thousands or even millions of wild virii or bacteria that are harmless, and make this particular one very harmful in order to study it and 'invent' medicines and vaccines, especially vaccines, to deal with it, in case this particular virus, chosen from among tousands if not millions of existing viruses in natue, happens to mutate into this particular form of the lab-created harmful virus.'
Not once, as far as I know, have any of the germs chosen to be GOFed into a deadly lab-germ actually evolved in the wild into one resembling the lab-created Frankenstein monster dopple-ganger. And not once has an effective cure for these Frankenstein dopple-gangers been invented.
‘Dual-Function Research’ . But fortunately, these research efforts were not wasted. They have another function: bio-weaponry, either defensive or offensive (makes no difference the best defence is offence, and the best offence needs good defence). 'Dual-function' research.
Like so much military and medical research, it is often tested on unsuspecting civilians, usually citizens of the same country that funds this research. Many of these 'research' projects that subject ordinary people to extraordinary dangers have been documented in the mainstream press. In two minutes I found over 90 instances of British and US governments doing the most extraordinarily dangerous things to ordinary people, without their knowledge, in order to 'further science'. Delving deeper would almost certainly produce a much longer list.
The innocent victims of this 'research' can console themselves, if they still live, with the honour that they have suffered for the 'Greater Good', though what this greater good is remains a mystery to me as none of this research has produced any substantial curative techniques, but has produced many ways of maiming and killing people.
BIS {'Bank for International Settlements'). This is a group of the most important national banks ('central banks or federal reserves, etc.). Most national banks operate independently from their governments, establishing interest rates, exchange rates, etc in order to make sure the whole national system does not collapse completely. In turn these banks meet and decide what global parameters they can set to enable the fragile global financial system to survive.
I have little idea of how they work in detail, nor how they relate to to transnationals, Governments, and the financial giants like BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street.
But it is clear that the decisions they take and implement affect us all as the financial markets affect us all. And we all know what those effects are - they're very very bad.
Thanks again Moe for presenting this situation so clearly. I'm always amazed (less so as time progresses) that, even to raise these issues in social situations is considered negative, bad vibes or even evil and sadistic. Considering people were angrily telling me that ' they would no longer shop in our shop' if the staff weren't vaccinated a couple of years ago. My family not happy for me to attended a get-together unless I took a phoney test. People refusing me entry to the local farmers market unless masked.
Will it take all these people to fall seriously ill and die before they can see what's happened? Maybe they'll deny it till the grave. Everyone else will have to pick up the pieces.